Glamour 1™ is loaded with great photographers and models portfolios, forums, photography tips, workshop info and much more than a typical portfolio site. These valuable services increases traffic and operating costs and those that support our community of models and photographers by upgrading their accounts as a Lifetime Member (pay only once, never pay again) enjoy practically no advertising--upgrade now to increase your viewing pleasure while supporting this community and family of glamour photographers and models.
Don't want to see this message or large ads, register, then upgrade now!
As Santana sings, Oye como va
mi ritmo
Bueno pa' gozar...
As Gordon and I worked on my second book, we did some "editorial" shooting for a different project--it's great when you can have 110 inches of video behind every model (grin) and playing with high-speed ISO's...lighting of course by the Hensel monolight, modeling lights...cool stuff! White-balance at 4300K, camera, Olympus E-Volt, E-300 (yes, less than $700 for this camera, 8MP), various lenses...and I just got my new Olympus 35-100mm F/2.0 lens today, can't see what that does when I'm back at this location in barely two weeks!
For now, enjoy a little Santana...Supernatural--Live, or order yours today, less than $11
<iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=garageglamour0c&o=1&p=8&l=as1& ;asins=B00004XMSE&=1&fc1=ffffff&IS2=1& amp;lt1=_blank&lc1=FF0000&bc1=000000&b g1=000000&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
and enjoy these images too
besides the noise issues shooting at high ISOs which are plainly evident in these B-Girl themed editorial images, i'm kind of surprised a guy with all the gadgetry you have isn't using a color meter to hone in precisely on your kelvin settings. especially since you often seem to enjoy playing around with color manipulations in your imagery.
Are you kidding? Correct the color out of a "bar scene?" Heck, it's more real if we produce it the way it looked, or make it appear to look. I will say, the prints are better than the images for the web, you lose a lot in the translation, like color and gritty grain. On paper, big difference.
But I have to disagree, why take "color" out of an image and turn it into "clear light?" In fact, my white-balance was purposely set at 4300K for the effect.
Wishing you the best, rg sends!
(Three distinct color temperatures in this image, shot available light, ISO 3200, white-balance 6000K)
well, i'm not saying you should identify the exact color temp and then shoot it that way. of course that would destroy the ambience of the location. but if you know where the white balance registers on the kelvin scale to begin with, you would be even better able to manipulate it to your desired reslults. companies like minolta and others don't manufacture these admitedly pricey instruments because they have no use.
Hey, who wants white in an image with no white, per say, in this environment where there are tungsten lights everywhere...rely on gut instinct...thanks, and take care my friend, rg sends!
Yep, shot at ISO 1600, the prints are better, plus these are outtakes from the actual ones that will be used, thanks, here's one at ISO 3200, thanks, happy holidays, rg sends!
Those are coming sweetie, have to wait to get over these holidays to seriously do some post-production, but for now, they rock, problem is sooo sooo many to pick from...for the record, you'll be in my second book though! Thanks, rg sends!
IP: 66.69.85.25
Linear Mode
