Glamour 1™ is loaded with great photographers and models portfolios, forums, photography tips, workshop info and much more than a typical portfolio site. These valuable services increases traffic and operating costs and those that support our community of models and photographers by upgrading their accounts as a Lifetime Member (pay only once, never pay again) enjoy practically no advertising--upgrade now to increase your viewing pleasure while supporting this community and family of glamour photographers and models.
Don't want to see this message or large ads, register, then upgrade now!
who would'a thought mark could also shoot with available light he made available himself?
nice man.
one small nit which, i believe you nitted at me one time-- altho i personally am sometimes mildly aroused by blonde peachfuzz, you might consider keeping an eye on the consistency of the skin processing, e.g., in this case between her face vs. her belly.
But not a furry face. Her skin is nearly flawless so I didn't really do any facial processing other than shadows or dark areas under her eyes. You must be on that 72" monitor...... [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Not a whole lot of difference in studio vs. natural lighting. One you put the light where the model is and the other, you put the model where the light is. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
I was just thinking about what this shot reminds me of...
You know that one commercial that shows some actress who asks you to name a leading character of a hollywood movie,....and then some other thing,...and then strikes a really hot pose, and asks you if you know the name of a character of the book your child is reading in English class.... Well, your model strikes a similar "really hot pose".....I just dig it! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
: 
IP: 70.34.248.21
Linear Mode
